IP

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Injury Prevention 1995;1:164-168; doi:10.1136/ip.1.3.164
Copyright © 1995 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Carter, Y. H.
Right arrow Articles by Lancashire, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Carter, Y. H.
Right arrow Articles by Lancashire, R. J.
Topic Collections
Right arrowRelevant Article

General practitioners' attitudes to child injury prevention in the UK: a national postal questionnaire.

Y. H. Carter, P. S. Morgan, R. J. Lancashire

Department of General Practice, University of Birmingham, Medical School, Edgbaston, UK.

OBJECTIVE: To survey the level of interest and involvement in child injury prevention among general practitioners and their practice teams, and to identify factors associated with current interest. DESIGN: Postal survey of a random sample of United Kingdom (UK) medical practitioners. SETTING: Medical practices throughout the UK. SUBJECTS: 957 general practitioners (50% of the total sample) who responded to the survey questionnaire. OUTCOMES: Answer to questions about role in injury prevention. RESULTS: Despite a response rate of only 50%, this study is the largest to examine the role of general practitioners in child injury prevention. Seven hundred and twenty five (77%) of the respondents considered injury prevention to be part of the general practitioner's role, but only 260 (28%) felt that they did enough in this area. Time was cited as the most significant limiting factor. Women doctors, rural practitioners, members of the Royal College of General Practitioners, and doctors with previous personal experience of serious accidents all had more positive attitudes to injury prevention as a routine part of their activities (p < 0.05). Practices providing first aid training for staff were also associated with an interest in injury prevention. The most appropriate times for offering prevention advice were thought to be during child health surveillance clinics and during treatment of an accident. CONCLUSIONS: Awareness about injury prevention opportunities might be improved by emphasising the roles of individual team members and by better addressing the training needs of the whole team.



Relevant Article

Effectiveness of injury prevention counseling.
J. L. Bass
Inj. Prev. 1995 1: 146. [PDF]






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 1995 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.