IP

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Knapik, J J
Right arrow Articles by Jones, B H
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Knapik, J J
Right arrow Articles by Jones, B H
Inj Prev 2004;10:37-42
© 2004 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd


ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Influence of an injury reduction program on injury and fitness outcomes among soldiers

J J Knapik1, S H Bullock1, S Canada1, E Toney2, J D Wells3, E Hoedebecke1, B H Jones1

1 United States Army Center for Health Promotion and Preventive Medicine, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland
2 M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
3 Brody School of Medicine, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina

Correspondence to:
Dr Joseph Knapik
Directorate of Epidemiology and Disease Surveillance, US Army Center for Health Promotion and Preventive Medicine, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21010, USA; joseph.knapik{at}apg.amedd.army.mil

Objective: This study evaluated the influence of a multiple injury control intervention on injury and physical fitness outcomes among soldiers attending United States Army Ordnance School Advanced Individual Training.

Methods: The study design was quasiexperimental involving a historical control group (n = 2559) that was compared to a multiple intervention group (n = 1283). Interventions in the multiple intervention group included modified physical training, injury education, and a unit based injury surveillance system (UBISS). The management responsible for training independently formed an Injury Control Advisory Committee that examined surveillance reports from the UBISS and recommended changes to training. On arrival at school, individual soldiers completed a demographics and lifestyle questionnaire and took an army physical fitness test (APFT: push-ups, sit-ups, and two mile run). Injuries among soldiers were tracked by a clinic based injury surveillance system that was separate from the UBISS. Soldiers completed a final APFT eight weeks after arrival at school.

Results: Cox regression (survival analysis) was used to examine differences in time to the first injury while controlling for group differences in demographics, lifestyle characteristics, and physical fitness. The adjusted relative risk of a time loss injury was 1.5 (95% confidence interval 1.2 to 1.8) times higher in the historical control men and 1.8 (95% confidence interval 1.1 to 2.8) times higher in the historical control women compared with the multiple intervention men and women, respectively. After correcting for the lower initial fitness of the multiple intervention group, there were no significant differences between the multiple intervention and historical control groups in terms of improvements in push-ups, sit-ups, or two mile run performance.

Conclusions: This multiple intervention program contributed to a reduction in injuries while improvements in physical fitness were similar to a traditional physical training program previously used at the school.


Keywords: military personnel; surveillance; physical education and training; health education; advisory committee

Abbreviations: AIT, advanced individual training; ANCOVA, analysis of covariance; ANOVA, analysis of variance; APFT, army physical fitness test; PRT, physical readiness training; RPT, remedial physical training; UBISS, unit based injury surveillance system




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Sports. Med.Home page
D Van Tiggelen, S Wickes, V Stevens, P Roosen, and E Witvrouw
Effective prevention of sports injuries: a model integrating efficacy, efficiency, compliance and risk-taking behaviour
Br. J. Sports Med., August 1, 2008; 42(8): 648 - 652.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2004 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.