IP

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shannon, H S
Right arrow Articles by Vidmar, M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shannon, H S
Right arrow Articles by Vidmar, M
Inj Prev 2004;10:292-295
© 2004 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd


ORIGINAL ARTICLE

How low can they go? Potential for reduction in work injury rates

H S Shannon1, M Vidmar2

1 Institute for Work & Health, Toronto and Program in Occupational Health and Environmental Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
2 Institute for Work & Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Correspondence to:
Professor Harry S Shannon
McMaster University, Program in Occupational Health and Environmental Medicine, 1200 Main Street West, Room 3H50, Hamilton, Ontario, L8N 3Z5 Canada; shannonh{at}mcmaster.ca

Background: There is a considerable variability in occupational injury rates across companies, even within the same industry. The aim of this study was to estimate how many injuries could be prevented if all firms could achieve the performance of their better peers.

Method: Data were obtained from the Workplace Safety & Insurance Board of Ontario on all insured firms in the province. Within rate groups (firms in the same type of business) the number of injuries expected if all firms had a lost time injury rate at the 25th percentile of the distribution for the rate group were estimated. The total number of injuries were compared with the expected number, after adjusting for firm size and type of injury.

Results: Overall, using the 25th percentile as a benchmark, 42% of lost time injuries in Ontario could be prevented.

Discussion: There is considerable potential for prevention of work injuries based on currently achieved, non-optimal benchmarks.


Abbreviations: FTE, full time equivalent; PR25, potential reduction in rate using 25th percentile as target; WSIB, Workplace Safety & Insurance Board

Keywords: occupational injury; benchmarking; work injury rates







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2004 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.