HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kostylova, A Articles by Feldman, D Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Kostylova, A Articles by Feldman, D

Concordance between childhood injury diagnoses from two sources: an injury surveillance system and a physician billing claims database

Centre de recherche interdisciplinaire en réadaptation du Montréal métropolitain, Institut de réadaptation de Montréal; Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Correspondence to:
Professor B Swaine
Centre de recherche interdisciplinaire en réadaptation du Montréal métropolitain (CRIR), Institut de réadaptation de Montréal, 6300, avenue Darlington, Montréal, Québec, Canada, H3S 2J4; bonnie.swaine{at}umontreal.ca

Objectives: (1) To determine the concordance between injury diagnoses (head injury (HI), probable HI, or orthopedic injury) for children visiting an emergency department for an injury using two data sources: an injury surveillance system (Canadian Hospitals Injury Research and Prevention Program, CHIRPP) and a physician billing claims database (Régie de l’assurance maladie de Québec, RAMQ), and (2) to determine the sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic and procedure codes in billing claims for identifying HI and orthopedic injury among children.

Design: In this cross sectional cohort, data for 3049 children who sought care for an injury (2000–01) were obtained from both sources and linked using the child’s personal health insurance number.

Methods: The physician recorded diagnostic codes from CHIRPP were used to categorize the children into three groups (HI, probable HI, and orthopedic), while an algorithm, using ICD-9-CM diagnostic and procedures codes from the RAMQ, was used to classify children into the same three groups.

Results: Concordance between the data sources was "substantial" (weighted Kappa 0.66; 95% CI 0.63 to 0.69). The sensitivity of diagnostic and procedure codes in the RAMQ database for identifying HI and for orthopedic injury were 0.61 (95% CI 0.57 to 0.64) and 0.97 (95% CI 0.96 to 0.98), respectively. The specificity for identifying HI and for orthopedic injury were 0.97 (95% CI 0.96 to 0.98) and 0.58 (95% CI 0.56 to 0.63), respectively.

Conclusion: Combining diagnostic and procedures codes in a physician billing claims database (the RAMQ database) may be a valid method of estimating injury occurrence among children.

Abbreviations: CHIRPP, Canadian Hospitals Injury Research and Prevention Program; HI, head injury; RAMQ, Régie de l’assurance maladie de Québec

Keywords: injury surveillance; head injury; validity; medical service claims