IP

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Injury Prevention 2006;12:87-92; doi:10.1136/ip.2005.011106
Copyright © 2006 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Web-only tables
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pickett, W
Right arrow Articles by Boyce, W F
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pickett, W
Right arrow Articles by Boyce, W F

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Associations between risk behavior and injury and the protective roles of social environments: an analysis of 7235 Canadian school children

W Pickett1,2,3, S Dostaler1, W Craig3, I Janssen1,4, K Simpson1,2, S Danielle Shelley3, W F Boyce1,5

1 Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Queen’s University, ON, Canada
2 Department of Emergency Medicine, Queen’s University, ON, Canada
3 Department of Psychology, Queen’s University, ON, Canada
4 School of Physical Health and Education, Queen’s University, ON, Canada
5 Social Program Evaluation Group, Faculty of Education, Queen’s University, ON, Canada

Correspondence to:
Dr W Pickett
Associate Professor, Queen’s University, Emergency Medicine Research, Angada 3, Kingston General Hospital, 76 Stuart Street, Kingston, ON, K7L 2V7, Canada; PickettW{at}post.queensu.ca

Objective: The social etiology of adolescent injury remains poorly understood. The Population Health Framework suggests that the etiology of adolescent injury involves interactions between individual risk factors and the natures of adolescent environments. The purpose of this study was to apply this framework to examination of relationships between adolescent risk taking and injury, and the potential modifying effects of supportive home and school environments.

Methods: The analysis was conducted in a representative sample of 7235 males and females (10–16 years old) from Canada. Results were based on records from the 2001/02 World Health Organization Health Behaviour in School-Aged Children Survey. Individual items and factor analytically derived scales were used to describe and then model injury outcomes, risk behaviors, perceived home, and school climates, and the relationships between these variables in a theory driven etiological analysis.

Results: Adolescents with supportive home and school environments experienced lower relative odds of engagement in risk taking behavior and lower relative odds of injury. Gradients were observed between the extent of adolescent risk taking and the occurrence of injury. Interactions were not observed between risk taking behavior, perceived support in home and school climates, and injury.

Conclusions: Risk taking is common among adolescents and plays a role in the etiology of injury. Supportive social climates clearly protect adolescents from engaging in these behaviors, and also the occurrence of some forms of injury. However, once an adolescent chooses to engage in risk taking behaviour, a supportive environment may not protect them from injury.


Abbreviations: HBSC, Health Behaviour in School Aged Children Survey; RMSEA, root mean square error of approximation

Keywords: adolescent behaviour; social support; etiology







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2006 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.