IP

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Injury Prevention 2006;12:373-377; doi:10.1136/ip.2005.011403
Copyright © 2006 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brussoni, M
Right arrow Articles by Hayes, M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brussoni, M
Right arrow Articles by Hayes, M
Topic Collections
Right arrowRelevant Article

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Evidence into practice: combining the art and science of injury prevention

M Brussoni1, E Towner1, M Hayes2

1 Centre for Child and Adolescent Health, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK
2 Child Accident Prevention Trust, London, UK

Correspondence to:
Dr M Brussoni
Centre for Child and Adolescent Health, University of the West of England, Hampton House, Cotham Hill, Bristol BS6 6JS, UK; mariana.brussoni{at}uwe.ac.uk

Objectives: To bring together scientific evidence of what works in injury prevention with the knowledge and experience of practitioners, using a case study of smoke alarm installation from England.

Design: There is good evidence of strategies to reduce injuries but less is known about the art of translating those strategies to implementation in real-world settings. England’s Health Development Agency developed a structured process applicable to many public health fields, which integrates practitioner knowledge into the evidence base and reflects local contexts. The multistep process includes convening structured field meetings with local practitioners and policy makers, which focus on a mapping exercise of strategies, policies, targets, and funding streams related to childhood injury prevention, and barriers and facilitators relating to implementation of specific interventions.

Setting: Meetings were held in six venues across England with 98 participants from a range of professional backgrounds and sectors.

Results: The collective knowledge of participants provided many local insights unlikely to emerge in conventional research. Discussion topics covered key partners and sectors to include when planning a program; national policies and programs that could be used to drive the agenda; potential sources of funding; the importance of providing and installing appropriate smoke alarms; targeting of programs; and suggestions for gaining access to hard-to-reach populations.

Conclusion: This methodology represents an efficient way of gaining insight necessary for successful implementation of evidence based programs. It may be particularly useful in lower and middle income countries, serving to translate evidence into the local contexts and circumstances within which practitioners operate.


Abbreviations: FRS, Fire and Rescue Service

Keywords: knowledge translation; evidence to practice; implementation; programme reflecting local context; smoke alarm


Relevant Article

Bridging the gap between research and practice: a continuing challenge
S Mallonee, C Fowler, and G R Istre
Inj. Prev. 2006 12: 357-359. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2006 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.