IP

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Injury Prevention 2007;13:32-36; doi:10.1136/ip.2006.012492
Copyright © 2007 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Verma, S K
Right arrow Articles by Smith, G S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Verma, S K
Right arrow Articles by Smith, G S

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Occupational physical demands and same-level falls resulting in fracture in female workers: an analysis of workers’ compensation claims

S K Verma1, G S Sorock2, G S Pransky3, T K Courtney1, G S Smith1

1 Quantitative Analysis Unit, Liberty Mutual Research Institute for Safety, Hopkinton, Massachusetts, USA
2 Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Center for Injury Research and Policy, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
3 Center for Disability Research, Liberty Mutual Research Institute for Safety, Hopkinton, Massachusetts, USA

Correspondence to:
Dr S K Verma
Quantitative Analysis Unit, Liberty Mutual Research Institute for Safety, 71 Frankland Road, Hopkinton, MA 01748, USA; Santosh.Verma{at}LibertyMutual.com

Objectives: To examine the association between occupational physical demands and risk of same-level falls resulting in fracture in female workers’ compensation claimants.

Methods: From workers’ compensation claims for same-level falls, 7286 female workers from three age groups (18–49, 50–59 and 60–79 years) were randomly selected. Levels of occupational physical activity, standing and sitting were assigned using occupational codes. Fracture occurrence was determined using the International Classification of Diseases codes. Risks of same-level falls resulting in fracture were compared by quartiles of physical activity, standing and sitting.

Results: In the 18–49-year age group, physical activity, standing and sitting at work were not significantly associated with risk of same-level falls resulting in fracture (p value trend: 0.07, 0.18 and 0.10, respectively). In the 50–59 and 60–79-year age groups, increasing duration of standing and decreasing duration of sitting were associated with decreasing risk of same-level falls resulting in fracture (p value trend: standing <0.001, 0.01; sitting <0.001, 0.02). In the 50–59-year age group, the relative risks of same-level falls resulting in fracture were 0.53, 0.41 and 0.82 for the second, third and highest quartiles of physical activity, respectively, as compared with workers in the lowest quartile (95% confidence interval 0.35 to 0.80, 0.23 to 0.72, 0.56 to 1.21, respectively). In the 60–79-year age group, there was a similar, but not significant, U-shaped association between occupational physical activity and risk of same-level falls resulting in fracture.

Conclusion: Moderate occupational physical demands may be associated with a decreased risk of same-level fall resulting in fracture in female workers’ compensation claimants >=50 years of age.


Abbreviations: HRT, hormone replacement therapy; ICD-9 CM, International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification; O*NET, Occupational Information Network







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2007 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.