HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) web only appendix Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Brown Kirschman, K. Articles by Smith, G. A Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Brown Kirschman, K. Articles by Smith, G. A Topic Collections Editor's choice

Resale of recalled children’s products online: an examination of the world’s largest yard sale

¹ Department of Psychology, University of Dayton, Dayton, Ohio, USA
² Center for Injury Research and Policy, Columbus Children’s Research Institute, Children’s Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA, Ohio State University, College of Medicine and Public Health, Department of Pediatrics, Columbus, OH, USA

Correspondence to:
Dr K J Brown Kirschman
Department of Psychology, 300 College Way, University of Dayton, Dayton, OH 45409, USA; KirschKe{at}notes.udayton.edu

Objective: To examine an online auction site for the presence and sale of children’s products and toys previously recalled because of safety concerns.

Methods: Targeted items were randomly selected from US Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) press releases of recalled children’s products dated 1992–2004. Auction listings from eBay were searched for the 150 targeted recalled items for 30 days. Item, seller, and buyer information were recorded from the auction listings.

Results: 190 auctions contained or were suspected to contain a recalled children’s item from the target list. Most of the recalled items were listed for sale from addresses within the United States, with sellers from Canada, Australia, Great Britain, and Ireland also represented. On average, six bids were placed on each recalled item, with 70% of auctions eventuating in a sale.

Conclusions: Recalled children’s products were found to be available for sale online and were sold most of the time, presenting a risk of injury to children. Although the CPSC is charged with notifying the public of recalled items, these results suggest that potentially hazardous products are recirculating online. A multi-front initiative to decrease the presence of hazards in online auctions is needed. This initiative should include increased manufacturer efforts to improve recall return rates, a requirement by online auction sites that sellers verify non-recall status before item posting, and parental checks of government recall websites before item purchase. Investigation of parental understanding and awareness of recalls and the potential risks associated with recall announcements is needed.

Keywords: consumer product safety; child product safety; online consumer safety