IP

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Injury Prevention 2007;13:258-263; doi:10.1136/ip.2006.014662
Copyright © 2007 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Read responses to this article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Poudel-Tandukar, K.
Right arrow Articles by Jimba, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Poudel-Tandukar, K.
Right arrow Articles by Jimba, M.

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Risk perception, road behavior, and pedestrian injury among adolescent students in Kathmandu, Nepal

Kalpana Poudel-Tandukar, Shinji Nakahara, Masao Ichikawa, Krishna C Poudel, Masamine Jimba

Department of International Community Health, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan

Correspondence to:
Professor M Jimba
Department of International Community Health, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan; mjimba{at}m.u-tokyo.ac.jp

Objective: To examine the relationship between the perceived safety of specified road behaviors, self-described road behaviors, and pedestrian injury among adolescent students in Kathmandu, Nepal.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 1557 adolescents in grades 6–8 across 14 schools in Kathmandu using a self-administered questionnaire in 2003. A multiple logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the data.

Results: Adolescents were more likely to suffer from pedestrian injury when they did not always "wait for green signals to cross the road". There were no significant associations between road behaviors such as "looking both ways along the road before crossing" or "playing in the road or sidewalks" and pedestrian injury. Adolescents who "perceived it safe to cross the road from any point" or "did not perceive it to be safer to cross the road at a zebra crossing" were less likely to "look both ways" or "wait for green signals" before crossing the road. Adolescents who "perceived it to be safe to play in the road" were more likely to play in the road or sidewalk. Similarly, this study showed a positive association between road safety education and adolescents’ road crossing behaviors.

Conclusion: Adolescents’ road behaviors, except for compliance with green signals, were not significantly associated with pedestrian injury. This suggests that a behavioral approach without modification of the traffic environment (such as provision of crossing signals) might not effectively prevent the occurrence of pedestrian injury in developing countries with poor traffic conditions.


Keywords: traffic; accidents; risk-taking; risk reduction behavior; school health; developing countries




eLetters:

Read all eLetters

Scapegoating pedestrians: the limits of engineering solutions and pedestrian behaviour-change
Tony H Reinhardt-Rutland
IP Online, 6 Sep 2007 [Full text]



HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2007 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.