IP

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Injury Prevention 2007;13:276-281; doi:10.1136/ip.2006.012930
Copyright © 2007 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lu, T H
Right arrow Articles by Hou, W H
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lu, T H
Right arrow Articles by Hou, W H

METHODOLOGIC ISSUES

Proportion of injury deaths with unspecified external cause codes: a comparison of Australia, Sweden, Taiwan and the US

T H Lu1, S Walker2, R N Anderson3, K McKenzie2, C Bjorkenstam4, W H Hou5

1 Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
2 National Centre for Classification in Health, School of Public Health, Queensland University of Technology, Queensland, Australia
3 Mortality Statistics Branch, Division of Vital Statistics, National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Hyattsville, Maryland, USA
4 Swedish Causes of Death Registry, Stockholm, Sweden
5 Department of Rehabilitation, E-Da Hospital, Kaoshung County, Taiwan

Correspondence to:
Dr T H Lu
Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, No 1 Dah Hsueh Road, Tainan 701, Taiwan; robertlu{at}mail.ncku.edu.tw

Background: The proportion of injury deaths with unspecified external cause codes has been used as an indicator of the level of comprehensiveness and specificity of information on death certificates provided by certifiers.

Objective: To compare the proportion of unspecified external cause codes across countries.

Methods: Multiple-cause-of-death mortality data for people who died in 2001 due to external causes in Australia, Sweden, Taiwan and the USA were used for this international comparison study. The proportion of injury deaths coded as due to an unspecified external cause (International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision, ICD-10, chapter XX) to all injury deaths in each block was calculated.

Results: Sweden (33%) had the highest proportion of use of the least specific code (ICD-10 code X59 exposure to unspecified factor), followed by Australia (17%), Taiwan (13%) and the USA (7%). More than two-thirds of the deceased for whom an ICD-10 code X59 was assigned in Sweden and Australia were those aged >=65 years, and more than half of them had femoral fractures. The percentage of use of the unspecified codes within specific groups of external causes was relatively high for falls and unintentional drowning.

Conclusions: Caution should be used in examining the compensatory effects of the unspecified external event code (ICD-10 code X59) on specific external causes (especially falls) when making international comparisons. Efforts are needed to educate certifiers to report sufficient information for specific coding so as to provide more useful information for injury prevention.


Abbreviations: ICD-10, International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision; NCIS, National Coroners Information System







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2007 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.