IP

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Injury Prevention 2008;14:164-169; doi:10.1136/ip.2007.016832
Copyright © 2008 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow web only appendices
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Swart, L
Right arrow Articles by Jordaan, E
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Swart, L
Right arrow Articles by Jordaan, E
Topic Collections
Right arrow Editor's choice

ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Paraprofessional home visitation program to prevent childhood unintentional injuries in low-income communities: a cluster randomized controlled trial

L Swart1, A van Niekerk2, M Seedat3, E Jordaan4

1 UNISA Institute for Social and Health Sciences, Lenasia, South Africa
2 MRC-UNISA Crime, Violence and Injury Lead Programme, Cape Town, South Africa
3 UNISA Institute for Social and Health Sciences and MRC-UNISA Crime, Violence and Injury Lead Programme, Johannesburg, South Africa
4 Biostatistics Unit, Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa

Ms L Swart, UNISA Institute for Social and Health Sciences, PO Box 1087, Lenasia 1820, South Africa, swartl{at}unisa.ac.za

Objective: To investigate the effectiveness of a paraprofessional home visitation program (HVP) to improve home safety and prevent injuries among children living in low-income settings.

Methods: The HVP was implemented in two low-income communities in South Africa. In each community, approximately 200 households were randomly selected for the trial. Eligible households were those with children aged <=10 years. Intervention households received four visits, one every two weeks, by trained paraprofessionals that focused on a specific injury topic and consisted of: information dissemination about specific injury prevention practices; home inspection accompanied by information about home hazards; and the supply of safety devices. The key outcomes to measure the presence of home hazards were scores for burns (safety practices, paraffin, and electrical), poisoning, and falls.

Results: Significant reductions were found for injury risks related to burn safety practices. For injury risks related to electrical burns, paraffin burns, and poisoning, a decline was also noted although this was not statistically significant. No decline was noted for fall-related risks.

Conclusions: Subject to further replication and evaluation, home visits by paraprofessionals providing safety education, home inspection, and safety devices be considered for integration into a comprehensive child injury prevention strategy in low-income communities.








HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2008 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.