IP

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Morrison, A
Right arrow Articles by Stone, D H
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Morrison, A
Right arrow Articles by Stone, D H
Injury Prevention 1998;4:50-52
© 1998 BMJ Publishing Group


METHODOLOGIC ISSUES

Injury surveillance in accident and emergency departments: to sample or not to sample?

A Morrison, D H Stone

Paediatric Epidemiology and Community Health (PEACH) Unit, Department of Child Health, University of Glasgow, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Yorkhill, Glasgow G3 8SJ

Correspondence to: Anita Morrison.

Objectives—To establish whether injury surveillance based on sampling strategies is as valid as total patient surveillance.

Methods—Canadian Hospitals Injury Reporting and Prevention Program (CHIRPP) data for 1996 were retrospectively analysed using five sampling frames. Proportions for key variables were calculated for each sample, then compared with the proportions for the total population of patients.

Results—Two of the five sampling frames produced statistically significant differences from the total population, which can be explained by seasonal variations. However, no significant differences were observed between the remaining three samples and the total population.

Conclusions—A well planned and executed sampling strategy can generate as valid data as total patient surveillance, obviating the need for data collection on every patient presenting with an injury or poisoning. In practice, however, systematic sampling can be difficult to implement and sustain, counterbalancing the economic advantages.


Keywords: surveillance; sampling




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Inj. Prev.Home page
D Shipton and D H Stone
The Yorkhill CHIRPP story: a qualitative evaluation of 10 years of injury surveillance at a Scottish children's hospital
Inj. Prev., August 1, 2008; 14(4): 245 - 249.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CMAJHome page
I. B. Pless
Preventing spinal cord injuries: Is this the best we can do?
Can. Med. Assoc. J., March 1, 2000; 162(6): 792 - 793.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Inj. Prev.Home page
D. H Stone, A. Morrison, and G. S Smith
Emergency department injury surveillance systems: the best use of limited resources?
Inj. Prev., September 1, 1999; 5(3): 166 - 167.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Inj. Prev.Home page
S. G Mackenzie and I. B. Pless
CHIRPP: Canada's principal injury surveillance program
Inj. Prev., September 1, 1999; 5(3): 208 - 213.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 1998 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.