|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
SPECIAL REPORT |
University of Washington School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA
Correspondence to: Dr Peter Cummings, Harborview Injury Prevention and Research Center, Box 359960, 325 Ninth Avenue, Seattle, WA 981042499, USA.
Abstract
Descriptions of exposure histories in persons with the same injury or illness ("case series"), and descriptions of outcomes in persons with the same exposure ("exposure series"), have the potential to contribute knowledge relevant to disease etiology in some special situations. The case series can be thought of as a primitive form of case-control studyone in which the controls are only implied. Similarly, the exposure series is a rudimentary type of cohort study. By keeping these analogies in mind, those who author or read studies without controls can assess the design or results for selection bias, confounding, or information bias. While studies without controls cannot supplant true case-control or cohort studies, they are relatively cheap and easy to perform, and there are circumstances in which they provide valuable information. Attention to design is needed to strengthen the results they provide.
Keywords: epidemiology; case-control study; cohort study; case series
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. Cummings and T. D. Koepsell Does Owning a Firearm Increase or Decrease the Risk of Death? JAMA, August 5, 1998; 280(5): 471 - 473. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS | REGISTER |