| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS | REGISTER |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
ORIGINAL ARTICLE |
1 South East Institute of Public Health, United Medical and Dental Schools of Guy's and St Thomas' Hospitals, London, UK
2 East Sussex Brighton and Hove Health Authority
3 Lambeth, Southwark and Lewisham Health Authority, and King's College School of Medicine and Dentistry, London
4 Department of Computing and Statistics, Brighton University
5 Department of Operational Research, London School of Economics and Political Science
6 Area Road Safety, Kent Highways
Correspondence to: Dr Colin Cryer, South East Institute of Public Health, David Salomons' Estate, Broomhill Road, Tunbridge Wells, Kent, TN3 0XT, UK.
Objectives—To assess the level of cycle helmet wearing among young people in two counties in the South East of England in 1994, and to identify the factors associated with helmet wearing.
Design—Cross sectional survey in a convenience sample.
Setting—Secondary schools in East Sussex and Kent.
Subjects—Students in year 7 (aged 10–12 years) and year 11 (aged 14–16 years).
Main outcome measures—Self reported "always wears a helmet".
Results—Among those who ride a bicycle, 32% of boys and 29% of girls aged 10–12 years, and 14% of boys and 10% of girls aged 14–16, reported that they always wear helmets. The variables that were most consistently associated with helmet wearing (that is significantly associated with helmet wearing in at least five of the six age, sex, and county subgroups) were: "parental encouragement to wear a helmet", "closest friend wears a helmet", "belief that laws that make children wear helmets are good", and "sometimes rides off-road".
Conclusions—The self reported rates of always wearing a cycle helmet in East Sussex and Kent are consistent with overseas findings for populations who had not been exposed to intensive helmet promotion. The evidence suggests that parental encouragement has a favourable effect on rates of cycle helmet use among secondary schoolchildren, which is separate from and additional to peer influences. When designing a helmet promotion programme, therefore, it will have added impact if both parents and children are addressed.
Keywords: bicycles; helmets; wearing rates
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  I. A Lang Demographic, socioeconomic, and attitudinal associations with children's cycle-helmet use in the absence of legislation Inj. Prev., October 1, 2007; 13(5): 355 - 358. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Khambalia, C. MacArthur, and P. C. Parkin Peer and Adult Companion Helmet Use Is Associated With Bicycle Helmet Use by Children Pediatrics, October 1, 2005; 116(4): 939 - 942. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D Kendrick and S Royal Cycle helmet ownership and use; a cluster randomised controlled trial in primary school children in deprived areas Arch. Dis. Child., April 1, 2004; 89(4): 330 - 335. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D Kendrick and S Royal Inequalities in cycle helmet use: cross sectional survey in schools in deprived areas of Nottingham Arch. Dis. Child., October 1, 2003; 88(10): 876 - 880. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C Finch, S Donohue, and A Garnham Safety attitudes and beliefs of junior Australian football players Inj. Prev., June 1, 2002; 8(2): 151 - 154. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M Moustaki, M Lariou, and E Petridou Cross country variation of fractures in the childhood population. Is the origin biological or "accidental"? Inj. Prev., March 1, 2001; 7(1): 77 - 77. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS | REGISTER |
