IP

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Warda, L.
Right arrow Articles by Koop, V. L
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Warda, L.
Right arrow Articles by Koop, V. L
Injury Prevention 1998;4:198-202
© 1998 BMJ Publishing Group


ORIGINAL ARTICLE

An observational study of protective equipment use among in-line skaters

Lynne Warda1, Sande Harlos2, Terry P Klassen3, Michael E K Moffatt4, Norma Buchan4, Virginia L Koop4

1 Pediatric Emergency Medicine, University of Manitoba, 840 Sherbrook Street, Room CE 205, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3A 1S1, Canada
2 Community Medicine, University of Manitoba
3 Research Institute, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
4 IM-PACT (Injuries Manitoba-Prevention of Adolescent and Childhood Trauma)

Correspondence to:
Dr Warda
(e-mail: lwarda{at}escape.ca).

Objectives—To describe the patterns of protective equipment use by in-line skaters in Winnipeg, Manitoba and nearby rural communities.

Methods—In-line skaters were observed for three months in 1996 at 190 urban and 30 rural sites selected using a formal sampling scheme. Age, gender, protective equipment use, skating companions, correct helmet use, and use of headphones were recorded.

Results—Altogether 123 in-line skaters were observed at 61 sites, including one rural site. No skaters were observed at the remaining sites. There were 37 adults and 86 children; 56% were male. Helmet use was 12.2% (95% confidence interval (CI ) = 6.4% to 18.0%), wrist guard use was 16.3% (95% CI = 9.7% to 22.8%), knee pad use was 9.8% (95% CI = 5.2% to 16.4%), and elbow pad use was 7.3% (95% CI = 3.4% to 13.4%). Children were more likely to wear a helmet than teens 12–19 years of age (relative risk (RR) = 30, 95% CI = 4.01 to 225). Adults were more likely to wear wrist guards than children (RR = 4.32, 95% CI = 1.87 to 9.94). No gender differences were found. Incorrect helmet use was documented in four skaters; three skaters were wearing headphones.

Conclusions—Low rates of protective equipment use were documented in our region, significantly lower than those reported in the literature. Barriers to equipment use are not known, and should be examined by further study. In-line skating safety programs should be developed, promoted, and evaluated. Teens should be targeted for future preventive efforts.


Keywords: in-line skating; protective equipment; helmet use




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PediatricsHome page
G. W. Parkinson and K. E. Hike
Bicycle Helmet Assessment During Well Visits Reveals Severe Shortcomings in Condition and Fit
Pediatrics, August 1, 2003; 112(2): 320 - 323.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CMAJHome page
B. Pless
Taking risks with injury prevention
Can. Med. Assoc. J., October 1, 2002; 167(7): 767 - 768.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Inj. Prev.Home page
D J Beirness, R D Foss, and K J Desmond
Use of protective equipment by in-line skaters: an observational study
Inj. Prev., March 1, 2001; 7(1): 51 - 55.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Inj. Prev.Home page
J S. Osberg and S. C Stiles
Safety behavior of in-line skaters
Inj. Prev., September 1, 2000; 6(3): 229 - 231.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Inj. Prev.Home page
S. Harlos, L. Warda, N. Buchan, T. P Klassen, V. L Koop, and M. E K Moffatt
Urban and rural patterns of bicycle helmet use: factors predicting usage
Inj. Prev., September 1, 1999; 5(3): 183 - 188.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 1998 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.