IP

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Beattie, T F
Right arrow Articles by Wright, P
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Beattie, T F
Right arrow Articles by Wright, P
Injury Prevention 1998;4:228-231
© 1998 BMJ Publishing Group


METHODOLOGIC ISSUES

Measures of injury severity in childhood: a critical overview

T F Beattie1, C E Currie2, J M Williams3, P Wright3

1 Accident and Emergency Department, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Edinburgh EH9 1LF, UK
2 Research Unit in Health and Behavioural Change, Medical School, University of Edinburgh
3 Department of Psychology, University of Edinburgh

Correspondence to:
Dr Beattie.

Many different methods for assessing injury severity have appeared in the literature. This paper discusses the commonly used measures, many of which are subjective and depend on clinical practice or sociological factors. Even if apparently objective measures are used their appropriateness for use in children is questionable. Particular problems occur with scoring or categorising events such as poisoning, choking, and near drowning. Researchers need to reach a consensus on injury severity reporting to ensure comparability between studies and programs for injury prevention.


Keywords: injury severity; severity scoring




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Inj. Prev.Home page
C. Cryer and J. D Langley
Studies need to make explicit the theoretical and case definitions of injury
Inj. Prev., April 1, 2008; 14(2): 74 - 77.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Inj. Prev.Home page
B Henary, C P Sherwood, J R Crandall, R W Kent, F E Vaca, K B Arbogast, and M J Bull
Car safety seats for children: rear facing for best protection
Inj. Prev., December 1, 2007; 13(6): 398 - 402.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Inj. Prev.Home page
A. Suruda, D. D Vernon, J. Reading, L. Cook, P. Nechodom, D. Leonard, and J M. Dean
Pre-hospital emergency medical services: a population based study of pediatric utilization
Inj. Prev., December 1, 1999; 5(4): 294 - 297.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Inj. Prev.Home page
P A Leonard, T F Beattie, and D R Gorman
Under representation of morbidity from paediatric bicycle accidents by official statistics--a need for data collection in the accident and emergency department
Inj. Prev., December 1, 1999; 5(4): 303 - 304.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Inj. Prev.Home page
P. Marsh and D. Kendrick
Using a diary to record near misses and minor injuries--which method of administration is best?
Inj. Prev., December 1, 1999; 5(4): 305 - 309.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 1998 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.