IP

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stevenson, M.
Right arrow Articles by Hall, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stevenson, M.
Right arrow Articles by Hall, M.
Injury Prevention 1999;5:26-30
© 1999 BMJ Publishing Group


ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Measuring community/environmental interventions: the Child Pedestrian Injury Prevention Project

Mark Stevenson1, Helena Iredell2, Peter Howat2, Donna Cross2, Margaret Hall2

1 Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Curtin University of Technology, Perth, Australia
2 Centre for Health Promotion Research, School of Public Health, Curtin University of Technology, Perth, Australia

Correspondence to:
Dr M Stevenson, NCIPC, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Mailstop K63, 4770 Buford Highway NE, Atlanta, GA 30341-3724, USA.

Objectives—To assess the effectiveness of community/environmental interventions undertaken as part of the Child Pedestrian Injury Prevention Project (CPIPP).

Setting—Three communities (local government areas) in the Perth metropolitan area, Western Australia.

Methods—A quasiexperimental community intervention trial was undertaken over three years (1995–97). Three communities were assigned to either: a community/environmental road safety intervention and a school based road/pedestrian safety education program (intervention group 1); a school based road/pedestrian safety education program only (intervention group 2); or to no road safety intervention (comparison group). Quantification of the various road safety community/environmental activities undertaken in each community during the trial was measured, and a cumulative community activity index developed. Estimates of the volume and speed of vehicular traffic were monitored over a two year period.

Results—Greater road safety activity was observed in intervention group 1 compared with the other groups. A significant reduction in the volume of traffic on local access roads was also observed over the period of the trial in intervention group 1, but not in the remaining groups.

Conclusions—The findings indicate that the various community/environmental interventions initiated in collaboration with CPIPP in intervention group 1 contributed, in part, to the observed reduction in the volume of traffic. A combination of community/environmental interventions and education are likely to reduce the rate of childhood pedestrian injury.


Keywords: Child Pedestrian Injury Prevention Project; pedestrians; interventions; community/environment




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Inj. Prev.Home page
N Harre
Discrepancy between actual and estimated speeds of drivers in the presence of child pedestrians
Inj. Prev., March 1, 2003; 9(1): 38 - 41.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Inj. Prev.Home page
C Mock, C Arreola Rissa, R Trevino Perez, V Almazan Saavedra, J Enrique Zozaya, R Gonzalez Solis, K Simpson, and M Hernandez Torre
Childhood injury prevention practices by parents in Mexico
Inj. Prev., December 1, 2002; 8(4): 303 - 305.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 1999 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.