HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lee, A. J Articles by Takriti, R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Lee, A. J Articles by Takriti, R.

A hospital led promotion campaign aimed to increase bicycle helmet wearing among children aged 11–15 living in West Berkshire 1992–98

Bicycle Helmet Initiative Trust, 6 Arkwright Road, First Floor, Reading, Berkshire RG2 0LU, UK

Correspondence to:
Angela Lee
(e-mail: BHIT{at}dial.pipex.com)

Objectives—To evaluate the effect of a bicycle helmet promotion campaign on helmet wearing among cyclists less than 16 years of age from 1992–98.

Setting—Reading, West Berkshire, UK.

Methods—A hospital led bicycle helmet promotion campaign targeted at 5–15 year olds. The campaign focused on education with active involvement of the children, parents, schools, and safety organisations. Local media and children's celebrities raised the profile of the campaign and a low cost helmet purchase scheme was also set up. A self administered questionnaire survey of 3000, 11–15 year olds was carried out over the period of the campaign. A control group of 3000 teenagers was obtained from a neighbouring area without a helmet campaign. Accident and emergency (A&E) figures were obtained from the local hospital within the campaign area on all children aged under 16 years, attending with bicycle injuries. Unfortunately, no figures were available from the A&E department in the control area.

Results—Self reported helmet use among 11–15 years olds living in the campaign area increased from 11% at the start of the campaign to 31% after five years (p<0.001), with no change in the control group. Hospital casualty figures in the campaign area for cycle related head injuries in the under 16 years age group, fell from 112.5/100 000 to 60.8/100 000 (from 21.6% of all cycle injuries to 11.7%; p<0.005).

Conclusions—This hospital led community bicycle helmet promotion campaign directed at young people showed an increase in the number of children reporting that they "always" wore their helmet while cycling. There was a significantly higher rate of helmet wearing than in the control area, and a significant reduction in head injuries.

Keywords: bicycle helmet; campaign; head injuries; teenagers

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J Vardy, E Clinton, and A Graham Audit of an intervention to decrease cycle related head injuries in primary school children. Inj. Prev., August 1, 2006; 12(4): 271 - 272. [Full Text] [PDF]

				P A Andersen, D B Buller, M D Scott, B J Walkosz, J H Voeks, G R Cutter, and M B Dignan Prevalence and diffusion of helmet use at ski areas in Western North America in 2001-02 Inj. Prev., December 1, 2004; 10(6): 358 - 362. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D Kendrick and S Royal Cycle helmet ownership and use; a cluster randomised controlled trial in primary school children in deprived areas Arch. Dis. Child., April 1, 2004; 89(4): 330 - 335. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A J Lee and N P Mann Cycle helmets Arch. Dis. Child., June 1, 2003; 88(6): 465 - 466. [Full Text] [PDF]

				I Maconochie Accident prevention Arch. Dis. Child., April 1, 2003; 88(4): 275 - 277. [Full Text] [PDF]