|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
ORIGINAL ARTICLE |
Department of Paediatric Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Institute of Child Health, London, UK
Correspondence to:
Dr Carolyn DiGuiseppi, Child Health Monitoring Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, 30 Guilford Street, London WC1N 1EH, UK (
C.DiGuiseppi{at}ich.ucl.ac.uk)
BackgroundFires are a leading cause of death, but non-fatal injuries from residential fires have not been well characterised.
MethodsTo identify residential fire injuries that resulted in an emergency department visit, hospitalisation, or death, computerised databases from emergency departments, hospitals, ambulance and helicopter services, the fire department, and the health department, and paper records from the local coroner and fire stations were screened in a deprived urban area between June 1996 and May 1997.
ResultThere were 131 fire related injuries, primarily smoke inhalation (76%), an incidence of 36 (95% confidence interval (CI) 30 to 42)/100 000 person years. Forty one patients (32%) were hospitalised (11 (95% CI 8 to 15)/100 000 person years) and three people (2%) died (0.8 (95% CI 0.2 to 2.4)/100 000 person years). Injury rates were highest in those 04 (68 (95% CI 39 to 112)/100 000 person years) and
85 years (90 (95% CI 29 to 213)/100 000 person years). Rates did not vary by sex. Leading causes of injury were unintentional house fires (63%), assault (8%), clothing and nightwear ignition (6%), and controlled fires (for example, gas burners) (4%). Cooking (31%) and smoker's materials (18%) were leading fire sources.
ConclusionsBecause of the varied causes of fire and flame injuries, it is likely that diverse interventions, targeted to those at highest risk, that is, the elderly, young children, and the poor, may be required to address this important public health problem.
Keywords: fires; burns; surveillance
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B A Mueller, E A Sidman, H Alter, R Perkins, and D C Grossman Randomized controlled trial of ionization and photoelectric smoke alarm functionality Inj. Prev., April 1, 2008; 14(2): 80 - 86. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Ginnelly, M. Sculpher, C. Bojke, I. Roberts, A. Wade, and C. Diguiseppi Determining the cost effectiveness of a smoke alarm give-away program using data from a randomized controlled trial Eur J Public Health, October 1, 2005; 15(5): 448 - 453. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Horan and S. Mallonee Injury Surveillance Epidemiol. Rev., August 1, 2003; 25(1): 24 - 42. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D Rowland and I Roberts Potential public health importance of the oven ready chip Inj. Prev., December 1, 2002; 8(4): 328 - 329. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. DiGuiseppi, I. Roberts, A. Wade, M. Sculpher, P. Edwards, C. Godward, H. Pan, and S. Slater Incidence of fires and related injuries after giving out free smoke alarms: cluster randomised controlled trial BMJ, November 2, 2002; 325(7371): 995 - 995. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Rowland, C. DiGuiseppi, I. Roberts, K. Curtis, H. Roberts, L. Ginnelly, M. Sculpher, and A. Wade Prevalence of working smoke alarms in local authority inner city housing: randomised controlled trial BMJ, November 2, 2002; 325(7371): 998 - 1001. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F P Rivara Burns: the importance of prevention Inj. Prev., December 1, 2000; 6(4): 243 - 244. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS | REGISTER |