IP

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stevenson, M
Right arrow Articles by McDonald-Smith, G
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stevenson, M
Right arrow Articles by McDonald-Smith, G
Injury Prevention 2001;7:10-13
© 2001 BMJ Publishing Group


METHODOLOGIC ISSUES

An overview of the injury severity score and the new injury severity score

M Stevenson1, M Segui-Gomez1, I Lescohier1, C Di Scala2, G McDonald-Smith3

1 Harvard Injury Control Research Center, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, USA
2 National Pediatric Trauma Registry, New England Medical Center, Boston
3 Trauma and Burn Services, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston

Correspondence and reprint requests to:
Dr Mark Stevenson, Road Accident Prevention Research Unit, Department of Public Health, University of Western Australia, Nedlands, WA 6907,
Australiamark{at}health.curtin.edu.au

Objective—The research was undertaken to describe the injury severity score (ISS) and the new injury severity score (NISS) and to illustrate their statistical properties.

Design—Descriptive analysis and assessment of the distribution of these scales.

Methods—Three data sources—the National Pediatric Trauma Registry; the Massachusetts Uniform Hospital Discharge Data Set; and a trauma registry from an urban level I trauma center in Massachusetts—were used to describe the distribution of the ISS and NISS among injured patients.

Results—The ISS/NISS was found to have a positively skewed distribution and transformation did not improve their skewness.

Conclusion—The findings suggest that for statistical or analytical purposes the ISS/NISS should not be considered a continuous variable, particularly if ISS/NISS is treated as a continuous variable for correlation with an outcome measure.


Keywords: injury severity score; new injury severity score; trauma




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Inj. Prev.Home page
C Cryer
Severity of injury measures and descriptive epidemiology.
Inj. Prev., April 1, 2006; 12(2): 67 - 68.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Inj. Prev.Home page
G Valuri, M Stevenson, C Finch, P Hamer, and B Elliott
The validity of a four week self-recall of sports injuries
Inj. Prev., June 1, 2005; 11(3): 135 - 137.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Inj. Prev.Home page
K J Phelan, J Khoury, D C Grossman, D Hu, L J D Wallace, N Bill, and H Kalkwarf
Pediatric motor vehicle related injuries in the Navajo Nation: the impact of the 1988 child occupant restraint laws
Inj. Prev., September 1, 2002; 8(3): 216 - 220.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2001 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.