HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lipscomb, H J Articles by Li, L Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Lipscomb, H J Articles by Li, L

Injuries among teens employed in the homebuilding industry in North Carolina

Division of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Duke University Medical Center

Correspondence to:
Hester J Lipscomb, Division of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, DUMC 3834, Durham, NC 27710, USA
hester.lipscomb{at}duke.edu

Objective—To describe injuries of teens employed in the residential construction industry and to assess whether their injury experiences are significantly different from those of adults in this high risk industry.

Methods and setting—North Carolina homebuilders workers' compensation data for a 41 month period were analyzed. Injuries of teens were identified and described by body part injured, nature, and cause of injury. Proportionate injury ratios were used to summarize and compare the injury experience of teens with those of adult construction workers.

Results—Teens had proportionately more injuries to the eye and foot and fewer injuries to the back than adults. They had more cuts and scratches and fewer sprains and strains. They also had proportionately fewer injuries from falls from elevations and overexertion, injuries that account for a significant cost burden in construction. Consistent with these findings, teens had significantly fewer injuries resulting in medical costs or lost time costs of $1000 or more.

Conclusions—The analyses indicate that injuries of teens are less serious than those of adults. This finding may indicate that their work exposures are less dangerous than those of adults in comparable broad categories of construction. However, the data also provide documentation of injuries to teens resulting from work at heights, use of power tools, and motor vehicles with the majority of more expensive claims involving one of these exposures. Construction is dangerous work and these results add to the documentation of the need for additional measures to prevent work related injuries among all workers—teens and adults—in this industry.

Keywords: occupational injury; construction; teens/adolescents

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. W. Runyan, J. Dal Santo, M. Schulman, H. J. Lipscomb, and T. A. Harris Work Hazards and Workplace Safety Violations Experienced by Adolescent Construction Workers Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, July 1, 2006; 160(7): 721 - 727. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]