HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by DiLillo, D Articles by Peterson, L Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by DiLillo, D Articles by Peterson, L

Maternal use of baby walkers with young children: recent trends and possible alternatives

¹ Department of Psychology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln
² Department of Psychology, University of Missouri-Columbia

Correspondence to:
Dr David DiLillo, Department of Psychology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, 238 Burnett Hall, Lincoln NE 68588–0308, USA
ddilillo{at}unl.edu

Objectives—To examine recent trends in baby walker and exersaucer use, and to assess maternal motivations for choosing to use or not use these devices with children.

Setting—Small, Midwestern city in the United States.

Methods—Retrospective telephone survey with a sample of 329 mothers who provided information about their use of walkers and exersaucers with 463 children born in Columbia, Missouri between January 1994 and April 1999.

Results—Baby walker use in the sample declined fairly steadily from 1994 to 1999, whereas exersaucer use increased during the same period. Altogether 88% of mothers were aware of the injury risks associated with walkers, and this knowledge was the most commonly reported reason for abstaining from walker use. Remarkably, 38% of participants with knowledge of walker risks nevertheless used these devices. Participants reported many reasons for using walkers and exersaucers, including child entertainment, perceived developmental benefit, easy availability, and improved safety of exersaucers.

Conclusions—Public knowledge of the hazards of walkers seems to be high, and this awareness is a likely factor in many caregivers' decisions not to use them. Future interventions should focus particular attention on those caregivers who continue to use walkers despite knowledge of the associated risks. In addition to persuasive interventions, alternatives to walkers should be encouraged. Exersaucers represent one viable alternative, and should be promoted as such by the media, pediatricians, and other child care professionals.

Keywords: baby walker; exersaucer; parental supervision

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. J. Shields and G. A. Smith Success in the Prevention of Infant Walker-Related Injuries: An Analysis of National Data, 1990-2001 Pediatrics, March 1, 2006; 117(3): e452 - e459. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K Rhodes, D Kendrick, and J Collier Baby walkers: paediatricians' knowledge, attitudes, and health promotion Arch. Dis. Child., December 1, 2003; 88(12): 1084 - 1085. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. G. Landen, U. Bauer, and M. Kohn Inadequate Supervision as a Cause of Injury Deaths Among Young Children in Alaska and Louisiana Pediatrics, February 1, 2003; 111(2): 328 - 331. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Woods, R. Hapgood, E. Bentley, D. Kendrick, and J. Dyas Talking about baby walkers: Insights about health education from the field Health Education Journal, January 1, 2003; 62(1): 41 - 49. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. Taylor Babywalkers BMJ, September 21, 2002; 325(7365): 612 - 612. [Full Text] [PDF]