|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
BRIEF REPORT |
1 South Florida Reception Center, Miami, Florida
2 Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
3 Community Education Department, Riley Hospital for Children, Indianapolis, Indiana
Correspondence to:
Dr John P May, Medical Director, South Florida Reception Center, 14000 NW 41st Street, Miami, FL 33178, USA;
Drjpmay{at}aol.com
ABSTRACT
Objectives: To determine whether criminals go to the hospital when they are shot. Such information is needed to check on the accuracy of using hospital emergency room data to estimate non-fatal gunshot wounds.
Setting: Five jails across the US.
Methods: A survey of inmates being booked into jail, administered by in-house health care staff.
Results: Over 90% of over 300 criminals who had been wounded sometime before their incarceration reported going to a hospital for treatment after being shot. These results are consistent with previous findings from one jail.
Conclusions: Jail inmates who had previously been shot were likely to have been treated in a hospital. This limited finding is consistent with the proposition that hospital/emergency department data may miss only a small percentage of gunshot wounds to criminals.
Keywords: gunshot; wounding; jail; surveillance; criminals; firearms
Abbreviations: NEISS, National Electronic Injury Surveillance System; NFISS, National Firearm Injury Statistical System
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. Ovens Why mandatory reporting of gunshot wounds is necessary: A response from the OMA's Executive of the Section on Emergency Medicine Can. Med. Assoc. J., April 13, 2004; 170(8): 1256 - 1257. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J F Denton and W V Fabricius Reality check: using newspapers, police reports, and court records to assess defensive gun use Inj. Prev., April 1, 2004; 10(2): 96 - 98. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS | REGISTER |